Family Law Assessments
Separation can raise difficult questions about children’s needs, their experiences, and the arrangements that may support them. A family-law psychological assessment provides an independent examination of the questions within its scope.
Explore Section 211 assessments, Views of the Child reports, parenting capacity, and what to expect from the process.
Independent assessment, clearly explained
In this setting, forensic means that psychological knowledge is applied to questions arising in a legal matter. The work may help clarify a child’s functioning, family relationships, parenting abilities, or another specifically identified issue. Its purpose, intended audience, and limits are established at the outset.
The assessor’s role is independent. Paying for an assessment does not purchase a particular conclusion. In BC Supreme Court family proceedings, an expert giving an opinion has a duty to assist the court rather than advocate for a party. A report contributes information and professional opinion; the court determines the legal outcome.
Drs. Michael, Simon, and Jesse Elterman practise independently. Their individual About pages describe their work; our shared Contact page lets you enquire with a particular psychologist about suitability and availability.
Types of assessment
Section 211 assessments
Address specified questions about a child’s needs, views, or a party’s ability and willingness to meet those needs. Scope may be broad or focused.
Views of the Child reports
Focus on the child’s perspective. Clarify whether the report records the child’s account or also includes professional evaluation.
Parenting capacity assessments
Examine a person’s ability to meet a particular child’s needs, considering strengths, concerns, and available supports.
Open a topic for more detail, limitations, and sources.
-
Section 211 of BC’s Family Law Act allows a court to appoint a person to assess one or more of three areas: a child’s needs, a child’s views, and a party’s ability and willingness to meet the child’s needs. “Section 211” therefore identifies a legal authority, not a single standard package. A report may be comprehensive or limited to particular questions.
A broader assessment can bring together information about the child and family to help address parenting questions. A narrower assessment may be sufficient when the issue is more specific. Neither the longest report nor the greatest number of appointments is automatically the most useful approach. The starting point is the question that needs an answer and the information required to answer it responsibly.
-
A Views of the Child report focuses on the child’s perspective. It can help adults understand the child’s experiences, concerns, relationships, and wishes without relying solely on either parent to describe them. A focused child-views report is not interchangeable with a full assessment of both parents and all parenting issues.
The names “Views,” “Voice,” and “Hear the Child” are used differently across services. Clarify whether the work simply records the child’s account or also includes professional evaluation, what other information will be considered, and whether recommendations are within scope. The report’s actual mandate matters more than its title.
The BC Hear the Child Society describes its reports as non-evaluative: an interviewer communicates what the child says without assessing the parents or deciding what arrangement is in the child’s best interests. An evaluative child-views assessment may examine the child’s views in context. These are different services; the appropriate choice depends on the question, the family’s circumstances, and any court directions.
BC Hear the Child Society: interview FAQs
-
Also called parental capacity assessments, these examine a person’s ability to meet a particular child’s needs. The focus is practical and specific: providing safe care, responding to emotional and developmental needs, maintaining appropriate routines and boundaries, and recognizing when support is needed. Relevant concerns may include psychological functioning, substance use, family violence, or other circumstances affecting parenting.
The useful question is how a difficulty affects caregiving, in what circumstances, and with what available supports. Assessment should consider strengths alongside concerns and distinguish adult difficulties from their actual implications for the child.
An assessment of one parent has a different scope from a comparison of parenting arrangements involving both parents. Ask whether the proposed work concerns one person’s functioning, specified caregiving questions, or a broader family assessment. Identify whether the referral arises in a parenting dispute, a child-protection matter, or another context; the same label should not be assumed to mean the same service.
-
Therapy focuses on treatment and a person’s therapeutic goals. A forensic assessment addresses specified questions for a legal purpose and may draw on accounts and records from several sources.
A treating therapist’s knowledge of one person or family relationship is different from the information gathered through an independent assessment. These roles require clear boundaries; a therapy relationship should not be assumed to include a parenting assessment or an opinion about another parent.
Before accepting a matter, the psychologist considers the referral question, requested role, scope of work, potential conflicts, and whether the service falls within his practice.
-
Under the Family Law Act, parenting agreements and orders must focus on the child’s best interests. Relevant considerations include wellbeing, views, important relationships, care history, developmental needs and stability, parenting abilities, and safety. There is no presumption that equal parenting time is best for every child.
Children can have meaningful input without being made responsible for choosing between parents. A report should be understood within its scope, alongside the wider information relevant to the decision.
The process and practical questions
-
The exact methods depend on the referral and the people involved. Possible components include separate parent interviews, developmentally appropriate meetings with children, observations of parent–child interactions, relevant records, information from other people who know the family, and psychological measures where appropriate.
No single interview, test result, or document answers every parenting question. The assessor brings together relevant information, considers alternative explanations, and explains important gaps or limitations.
Before appointments begin, ask about the questions to be addressed; any existing order or agreement; who will participate; how other information will be obtained; the assessor’s role and consent requirements; confidentiality; fees; scheduling; and report delivery. These discussions help make the process understandable and identify practical difficulties early.
If an important person or record is unavailable, raise the issue promptly. Missing information can affect what can be concluded and the limitations stated in the report. A limited assessment should not be interpreted as though it examined every relevant person or issue.
AFCC parenting evaluation guidance
-
Children can have meaningful input without being made responsible for choosing between parents. Their participation should be explained in language they understand, including who will hear or read what they share. The aim is to understand their perspective while keeping responsibility for adult decisions with adults.
Ask the assessor how to explain the appointment to your child. Avoid rehearsing answers, asking the child to deliver a message, or pressing for a detailed account afterward. A simple explanation that the professional wants to understand the child’s experience can be enough; the assessor can adapt that explanation to the child’s age and the planned work.
A child’s preference does not by itself determine the outcome. Hearing a child provides a perspective that adults need to consider; it does not transfer responsibility for the decision to the child.
-
Family violence requires specific attention. BC law directs consideration of its nature, seriousness, recency, frequency, coercive and controlling patterns, children’s exposure, and resulting harm. Safety considerations also affect whether arrangements requiring parental cooperation are appropriate.
Tell the assessor early about protection orders, threats, monitoring, unsafe contact, or concerns about retaliation. The assessment process itself may need adjustments to support safer participation. Raising a safety concern does not establish a conclusion in advance; it identifies information that needs careful examination. Disclosures should be understood in context, including barriers to speaking openly.
An assessment is not an emergency response service. Immediate safety concerns need urgent assistance rather than waiting for an assessment appointment or report.
-
Forensic assessment involves limits on confidentiality. Information may be used in a report or disclosed as authorized or legally required. Under section 211, the report goes to the court and, unless the court orders otherwise, each party.
Clarify who will receive the report, how records may be used, and any safety concerns before sharing detailed information. A child also needs an age-appropriate explanation of how information from an interview may be shared. Confidentiality in assessment should not be assumed to work in the same way as a private therapy conversation.
-
Request an estimate for the particular referral. Ask what work the estimate covers, what could change it, when appointments could begin, and whether report preparation, travel, additional records, or testimony have separate charges. Mention any court deadlines at the first enquiry; availability and completion dates need explicit confirmation.
You can enquire before there is a court order. An initial enquiry can establish whether a psychologist considers the proposed work and has availability. It does not establish the authority to proceed or commit the psychologist to accepting the referral. Provide a short description of the requested service and mention any existing order, proposed mandate, and relevant deadline. Ask what documents are needed before sending sensitive records.
Raise any interpreter, accessibility, language, cultural, or safety needs early. The psychologist should explain the proposed service, information use, limitations, and costs in a way that supports informed participation. Each psychologist determines the suitability, scope, and availability of services within his independent practice.